<- Back to portfolio

Case study

Telehealth Cost-Effectiveness Study

A retrospective cost analysis of telehealth-powered managed care against conventional in-person care for acute respiratory infection.

Role
Co-author, data engineering - Rey.id (employer publication)
Stack
Cost-effectiveness analysis, Retrospective claims data, Sensitivity analysis

Problem and constraints

Acute respiratory infection is one of the most common reasons people seek primary care, and in Indonesia that traditionally means an in-person visit to a general practitioner or a specialist: consultation time, travel across the city, and a prescription filled at a pharmacy. The question the business needed answered was not whether telehealth works clinically, but what it does to the cost of treating one episode, and which component drives the difference - because that answer decides whether the premium can move.

Approach

Retrospective analysis of the telemedicine consultation database over 24 months, comparing two delivery models for the same diagnosis group: telehealth-powered managed care - teleconsultation, pharmacy delivery, and an offline visit when it is needed - against conventional in-person care. Four cost categories were compared: consultation, prescription, travel, and the greenhouse-gas externality of the travel that did not happen. The drivers were then separated with a sensitivity analysis over a modelled cohort, first holding the premium constant and then applying a premium discount, to test what the change does to margin and to what the patient pays.

Measured result

Telehealth-powered managed care came out almost 7x cheaper per treated episode than conventional care for the same diagnosis group. Consultation and prescription differences carried most of the saving; travel time contributed less, and the greenhouse-gas effect was the smallest of the four categories. The work was presented at the International Conference of Public Health (ICOPH) 2024 in Bangkok and published in the conference abstract book.

What Value Scope and source
cases analysed 3,298 3,209 managed-care cases and 89 outpatient-only cases from the telemedicine consultation database
study window 24 months July 2022 to June 2024, analysed retrospectively
cost categories compared 4 consultation, prescription, travel, and the greenhouse-gas externality
modelled cohort in the sensitivity analysis 1,000 individuals premium held constant, then discounted, both measured against the conventional baseline
cost per treated episode almost 7x lower telehealth-powered managed care versus conventional in-person care, acute respiratory infection diagnoses
presenting venue ICOPH 2024 International Conference of Public Health, Bangkok, 15-16 August 2024

Stack

Cost-effectiveness analysis Retrospective claims data Sensitivity analysis